Medical tests,
diagnostics, typing
The OTA concluded: “There are no mechanisms in
place to limit dissemination of technologies regardless of their clinical
value.” Shortly after the release of this report, the OTA was disbanded
(1995). Death by
Medicine----Carolyn Dean, MD, ND, Martin Feldman, MD, Gary Null, PhD, Debora
Rasio, MD (2003/4)
"Almost every stage of obstetrical procedure in the hospital is part of the
mechanism that enables the doctor to create his own pathology."--Robert Mendelsohn MD
[2011 Oct] Women
endangered by high rate of false-positive mammograms
[2011 July] Widely used
CAD mammography tool fails to find invasive breast cancer, causes needless tests
and stress "In real-world practice, CAD
increases the chances of being unnecessarily called back for further testing
because of false-positive results without clear benefits to women,” said Joshua
Fenton, assistant professor in the UC Davis Department of Family and Community
Medicine. “Breast cancers were detected at a similar stage and size regardless
of whether or not radiologists used CAD."
[2011 March] CT Scans
Cause Coming Cancer Epidemic by PATRICK MALONE
[2011 April] 20 year
trial shows prostate cancer test not worth having.
Brain Scans Show Whatever You Want to See
[2010 Nov] MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS:
CONFUSION By JON RAPPOPORT
[2010 Nov] Lies, Damned Lies, and
Medical Science Tatsioni doesn’t so much fear that someone will carve out
the man’s healthy appendix. Rather, she’s concerned that, like many patients,
he’ll end up with prescriptions for multiple drugs that will do little to help
him, and may well harm him. “Usually what happens is that the doctor will ask
for a suite of biochemical tests—liver fat, pancreas function, and so on,” she
tells me. “The tests could turn up something, but they’re probably irrelevant.
Just having a good talk with the patient and getting a close history is much
more likely to tell me what’s wrong.” Of course, the doctors have all been
trained to order these tests, she notes, and doing so is a lot quicker than a
long bedside chat. They’re also trained to ply the patient with whatever drugs
might help whack any errant test numbers back into line. What they’re not
trained to do is to go back and look at the research papers that helped make
these drugs the standard of care. “When you look the papers up, you often find
the drugs didn’t even work better than a placebo. And no one tested how they
worked in combination with the other drugs,” she says. “Just taking the patient
off everything can improve their health right away.” But not only is checking
out the research another time-consuming task, patients often don’t even like
it when they’re taken off their drugs, she explains; they find their
prescriptions reassuring.
[2010 May] Why men
shouldn't rely on the prostate cancer test - by the doctor behind its discovery
[2010 jan] CAT scan cancer
fear; Radiation 'could trigger the disease in one in 80 patients'.
[2009 July] Cervical smear surgery 'given
needlessly' to women with borderline results
[2009 July] Cancer Screening: Does It
Really Save Lives? by Dr. Julian Whitaker
The Truth About Surgeries
and Biopsies by John A. Richardson,
[Pap tests] My Early
Experience with the Medical Racket
THE
DOWNSIDE OF SCREENING FOR CANCER by Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D.
Lyme disease: The tests are only as
good as the toss of a coin
[1988/2006] The Massive
Fraud Behind HIV Tests by Jon Rappoport
[July 2007]
Early Detection Myth - Screening (For Cancer etc.) Fails Test
Incorrect STD tests show
need for patients' sex histories
Thousands given wrong results in STD tests in
British Columbia Thursday, October 30, 2003
Michelle Fay Cortez, "Colon-Cancer Test
Misses 95% of Cases, Study Shows", Bloomberg, January
18, 2005,

Blood
"Up to 10% of childhood cancers are caused by radiological examination during
pregnancy."---(Prof. R. Doll, Nature, Vol. 265, 1977,
page 589.)